鲜花( 1) 鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 / l0 `# s Y0 t$ C. {
6 k: C! o6 E# S) m; R
! e- r( l$ x/ C$ d! r% G1 m5 sIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. : ^3 Z$ k% [: H: J3 d+ C; M0 [% ?7 b
5 L7 G( |1 _# \+ J B* s
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03% O) z G; C/ p5 B3 {
2 V8 _% |7 M' J ]8 T+ g* y2 X
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
; ?$ O4 l; R* y% T# ^% W
( E h4 X: z- I4 p1 S" P) vNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
: [0 T7 O5 M8 l8 {8 V' u |
|