鲜花( 0) 鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable $ w6 k* Q9 n( B' d. D) t6 J
- @& p) B# G& w
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -$ ?2 e) W# t/ M( Q2 h' {( m( Y
5 V. T" J0 H: x. \$ v9 \
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market5 V5 {3 y& e& b8 ]% q ?+ B. }. `5 g
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third1 E F0 M) J- c" W& g0 o
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
+ c. m& }0 X, I: J1 uin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit9 V* a' S2 v1 w6 \9 ~. F! I
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and- A* D1 K8 M7 E2 H- ?) O
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
8 h9 t8 E6 q2 QQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal8 S4 w! p0 o. J# K3 y/ |5 T
LePage Real Estate Services.
3 M1 [$ Z9 @4 {3 R' }: c8 N! p0 D8 A0 M1 V3 c- f0 ^# ?
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters) }, S, ]5 V1 ~5 j, B" z7 [$ z
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic0 k n6 @& o. `" t
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and4 a- Y$ q' x( w" a* ]
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the# r* x" H1 z% E% R6 ]
residential real estate sector.
2 [$ K& O f& @+ K% c1 g- @1 l+ n( A8 J5 V# m+ Q' y# u5 p
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation4 Z# L9 F+ V r' P Y) V) v
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
7 e& g) [& A ]! x# a; G+ myear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5628 Q% a( H k; x
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
/ I B) n0 H: b4 Q6 j; E" ~6 u(+13.2%).
1 u' N3 E6 L9 @1 B% S5 M0 o8 v) T# }# \* N' E$ M
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
/ t; Z: U# k8 [during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
+ I7 K/ k( P0 _& ?/ l$ N" ufrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are( b0 c1 W- ^: T. v& D1 O
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,2 F1 Y% S6 @7 v$ I9 q
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.8 e1 f9 S. p3 H* ~6 H# r0 J
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We+ h, q! Z- r3 X2 z+ j; r: P- z
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
* l& k, H2 f& x# G3 t4 gbalanced market.": t% D/ S: i7 B
5 \# c" t. M% l! k
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,/ K" D' U. q1 g5 }: ?4 l* ^- I
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
* U" [- y4 B9 i0 S" g# _8 vto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
0 I7 g5 {8 R0 U/ jthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
# M/ B2 ?. b. B( M1 o" Nenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
1 x( \; B z/ t6 e+ n; n2 h% zmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record0 r' D7 R8 E! ?) T& }" Z, C
breaking price appreciations.( g t9 _ M! U4 u1 K7 e i; \
+ [. v& W2 {+ R+ W* n; v& p Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
8 k. [, `4 z2 m* o: Eeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
7 f/ ]9 x+ H4 J9 E# f% elargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.& I( Z6 h2 M* m& x
# O; W: @ z3 T2 Y0 k' J% v' O In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
; ~0 Z% m7 p7 Z! geconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
% x- J9 I( l5 G4 G2 Mconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off' Z1 z4 L H1 m7 o5 q% E* n, P T
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.6 v) k+ r3 m. Z/ E
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers# j& S: t" [& Y: @
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
+ N. C+ ^; l7 F' x# Nprice appreciation when compared with 2005.3 q/ d7 ^! m% O1 e: |; j
6 i" A7 I+ x# c- d; j
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
( D% g2 Z3 j+ W* amarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and1 C3 e! r5 n8 O0 k* E
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada7 }& k2 @# H+ k$ X: ~5 H* x
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
# C1 `3 n; E' W1 @! J9 o
6 b" i; `6 N3 A. Q; l Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
. M. T/ b6 C2 v8 e0 qAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
% ^* I1 e2 @8 S. d1 `7 W$ t) E/ yfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
* M* }. y! Z G0 i0 Arelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
7 E, E& p7 ^9 qaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
- Q7 G k. C( s( I5 cdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
! {' s' r% z; ?: g# c9 b9 laggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
" [% M b9 q, Kmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
# u& G, v- o7 T- Z X& B7 z) O
2 ]4 m. d' u' S" }4 }( U- t <<
- s* K" l, [) e) ~2 ^ REGIONAL SUMMARIES/ R M0 a* }* i
>>& s; {' u- A/ W7 e2 o
- N1 _2 i& x& q1 Z8 K- F! K
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
* m9 I6 N! _5 ?' P x) \Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
6 j C A; x* R8 }( b% z" oof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
6 ~! J$ _+ v3 \( V' E* q1 @looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of9 c' E3 ?6 n- h4 `* [2 S
renovations.5 L x. ?+ }/ S' x4 V
# _5 A3 l) E3 Z8 {% H The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
# y! S; O; c+ Oincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation8 S( C" `( R2 P! s2 M
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and9 O ?* v2 ~) x. [# h) z; r8 }
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.. h6 `) h6 w0 Y4 d
+ B% h: I) Y- x
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer/ v4 N- b* A8 q# r
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the. v9 m' ^1 `& l, J, Z0 B
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
" C2 C% X' q1 ~& F$ G! l7 |: g600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores2 J$ F7 |0 ~& X9 p
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
& ^/ B9 M! b" j) T& Xand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.; j7 q* x: i4 b- }
0 ]% a: |- y% L+ b2 T: Y In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced I7 I2 Q K8 C C6 N* A/ X, n
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their2 X+ N& C, C# Z( v" N- E
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers. C% g/ h" e( O! D& D
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
. S* r; `$ h, Q9 n' {& Y& J9 Udollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing3 \# Y4 h' O- Y0 a8 P% i
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
$ ?) N6 n n8 F
/ \9 B2 \$ p1 X Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
; t- _" B! S" m" x e P* famong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes, A$ u1 D9 a9 y
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,5 j( L) H( B# M, a4 i. F! F
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last6 D! l0 i0 T8 Z- o
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions." V7 ~6 m) J' A5 A) p1 [0 ~
7 e/ m, U/ o% E3 Y7 ^6 I
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
5 I+ c4 i& o7 j2 f4 zprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
% Z& w& c/ }. u0 d* C5 F5 ulevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
) D9 @' r/ _1 e$ v; \ [first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,1 s N* g0 U* }
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the& N! z$ I3 G4 E
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
/ ]) Z; K9 w: ]% `$ B' k0 u, n1 xmaking a purchase.! U+ p" h) H& O8 o. }: @
5 o: L/ b d7 w9 d; ~: e
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing0 R0 C6 u2 |0 C2 v8 ?1 `* y
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
0 }: b5 K; R, A; r7 {1 n2 @* Pconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city: m6 b, h' g! c8 C( {# S
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
2 t T8 z8 }. T2 [" aattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown% V& w4 e7 e$ o# H6 {" @. Z4 x* E D. |
amenities.9 \( {- |( K7 b2 T0 ^
* p0 i* i2 ?# w+ ~0 l( c N
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
2 {9 N- D+ B1 E. f2 j2 M: w( qthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand; z j8 N E, v2 N5 i5 z' e( d
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
" N1 S+ ]9 e/ L4 I! h. ~- b/ @continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
; a# i) ]! y+ ]8 B3 k, Odriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
% N1 @; g2 l5 c/ a Uresidence, rather than for investment.
9 A6 s r1 Y/ r; f4 l8 G1 Y4 E5 S
; ]" {2 v2 t0 a The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
; `1 w* P0 m `house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
) m4 L$ W! Y3 I4 s1 s$ Vin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer1 k5 Z4 s N1 a/ r, t
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization; E& j6 n; u4 e" \
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter2 ?9 m0 B; c% b# w" r" t* f1 y
the market.
' D5 n& ^0 n, @3 _, a8 z C# ~8 M$ k4 N) g9 l# u! d: [* z, N
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
4 g9 U1 ?3 S- b4 s* OJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
, E h ?; }, u' A T$ ~August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
( z, g. U3 k* smonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
) d1 h, C* j$ o2 o- l( D+ \- P* kto the shortage of available inventory.2 I% M3 k6 i% w+ u& g" e
( G- M# R4 A# e0 w! P Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
( s8 o+ J/ D" K7 Y# j, umomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
" ], [/ _$ ~1 k& w. y9 Evibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
/ ~/ _ z( Y7 N) hstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.& c+ q0 |* N1 `/ j) W }
, c3 ~) R6 O' f2 ? Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases+ b6 e' C0 c: E; U6 a$ Y6 D) W
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low! o# O- E0 B0 a4 _) H8 n+ O
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that, w' l3 K/ c0 F4 E1 R+ x% |/ w
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
7 ?2 l. d! A( p& H: W+ |, aprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
8 ^2 E! h2 C @9 `0 Mseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as5 q/ u- ~" J" n; V* F; p1 m y
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.4 L6 m2 A, V! M- m( X ?3 F# E
) g( [$ a$ P' O! }1 Z2 H5 G* x Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
+ J; }6 f1 _! F! Q1 gas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
6 b) ^% c4 |+ C0 a, }6 x* h7 tremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
; w& ]8 l! w8 F/ B1 e$ X- cmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices( R1 _8 C, X9 D% x4 r* V0 R
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
8 y0 w! O! J/ T4 h; R; {0 g# a, Jin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly* B& a8 z7 b! k: J5 i" m
towards the end of 2006.
1 j" F& v/ f! A3 |4 Z; _
$ f; L( [4 L0 `, kWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of/ Q! X6 L5 ?8 I% ~
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable# p' s: C" S3 m$ F5 }5 W- ~9 X
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse% E" f* g6 x6 M/ p, J; F! C
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to* Q0 R$ B( A/ E7 y+ x; U6 W
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
1 r S# C8 G" j& e' S3 n1 e/ |, y$ {pressure on tight inventory levels.5 z/ C5 r# n2 r" a; t% i
1 y4 K% Z6 x/ L8 p6 b$ T
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
- m- P& y) B, Cfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
$ c2 E3 j) s' S* D) G% m! h: }into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;7 c1 i4 X ]! R
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
$ _: R" [$ G4 o3 s2 ?; ]. Afor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace." d) u) y# [. P. T) Z% p% Q
; T/ C3 _$ ?* w" N1 b* w/ u f% c
<<
4 w4 h U/ A8 I1 v- r Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20061 k/ Z; n4 `$ a4 f# C' t
% w0 R) y: P! _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- h1 C3 i: C0 k) f0 `8 j
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey. ]8 `7 v7 k0 v8 K+ q q9 A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! M; M5 U4 D% O" I
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
$ `0 Q( b1 U4 [8 ~ Market Average Average % Change Average Average
7 Z: M. R6 y, F% Z2 Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% D: R. l' ?0 [0 ~1 F* \5 y Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000* u+ h' z" a+ N) G6 l0 g$ C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 X; w a( w$ Q# g Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
! F1 B4 y- Z$ `# J9 n) ]' V -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 ?! j( B( ^$ ^$ _
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000' v/ q* S9 a+ _3 J# G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 @1 a, p: h7 x6 V# B# Z, A% o' E A- A Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -& x8 m# I J+ N5 V2 ~6 J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 i( ]. s+ b' n3 {5 B St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
) Q x; S' C$ h, J I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 G7 j3 y4 z- r3 z Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5831 k7 Y* r8 W6 x8 E* k( a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& w% v1 ~+ A" N5 K# z: c: q c
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
a- W4 w0 d d -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ~0 y( p6 D" Z' f
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
7 M9 X! G/ B5 w( l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 u- F) w9 p/ r Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766- O$ X8 q& e! F$ }# q+ G) P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ T) M( I, R4 \" Y+ t. U: R9 V* W Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707- k0 |: T4 O3 _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 ]. F4 k# Z* X, C) ~ Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5004 w4 e# ^ h& V5 @$ [: b3 v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 ]" Y o3 h. h' J" ^2 N
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
M' A7 k3 p: [, o( ^1 ^4 X6 ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------. {. s4 O( S9 @0 j6 p% ?+ U+ j& R) E
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714' @" s8 [" g$ J, ~. \
------------------------------------------------------------------------- r- ^: J2 @$ b3 J9 |5 Y* X
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
" [# b& O; i! ^/ T -------------------------------------------------------------------------
{1 M, P6 x& U& b( B1 d Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
d: x: l6 E# U9 z1 s# d- ~5 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. y9 F/ L i& b/ J+ c National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
4 C- q) q5 Q4 x% h- A3 a" z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 y0 P: Q2 P/ I5 c* ]5 X: m
2 D% [; L# O% h" W -------------------------------------------------------------
/ R5 @3 k3 l5 p; ?/ N Standard Condominium- P' o& P& i- ?3 v" { `5 z' @% e6 j
-------------------------------------------------------------
: Y1 g" |& O$ }: V 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
6 V- T! {# d3 y0 d Market % Change Average Average % Change4 s8 |& n1 Y. ?$ {+ t" \5 b
------------------------------------------------------------- J( l9 g" D# E8 T- O# C; w
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%% [+ E0 S$ A6 v' L
-------------------------------------------------------------8 z- U. d7 i) r% C
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
4 {- `5 c4 F+ e) H -------------------------------------------------------------1 t/ W ?4 U5 G
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
. ?) k7 P, l X& s% u ------------------------------------------------------------- j6 g3 P( x! n3 f# |
Saint John N/A - - N/A
# ?0 j. m" e1 L$ L0 w -------------------------------------------------------------
+ K# W8 N5 l, t m( V% h St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
2 w7 r# r, _8 N1 G( b -------------------------------------------------------------: D3 M5 J, b9 b; K2 e/ w
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%( E( T/ C1 q! P
-------------------------------------------------------------
* i' |# E. P J/ R4 |# e Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%. |) Z/ e0 A5 O2 W; a c" p6 O$ S
-------------------------------------------------------------8 ?7 P! i7 B+ M) C. j/ m6 ~
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
& C9 U6 u t# @ -------------------------------------------------------------
6 S/ [3 _. _. ?6 N3 T8 ` G Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%- P" ?: H" [9 r# e: M$ V; c! K3 ]4 \" l
-------------------------------------------------------------5 {. Y& n @% Y9 D/ t$ t
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
( f( ]. u+ a: B$ d5 j4 ~5 f/ V% h -------------------------------------------------------------3 X- x1 @% e$ U7 ^8 K/ E
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%5 F/ C7 u8 h+ c
-------------------------------------------------------------
& h: ]* U" {. O7 M# ]4 i Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%1 F4 J C" ~5 p# _3 {) x
-------------------------------------------------------------6 D+ |+ n) a1 t- L( k! N
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
: P# ~ p/ q3 E4 o -------------------------------------------------------------# H* [) _4 L1 q; m4 F
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%: R4 @; g( @0 P
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ Y* y( T3 c! h2 X. r& { Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%0 @8 @ U7 r2 p }2 F- O
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 b$ N5 }: ?( F National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%- E* k- q0 X1 I) I
-------------------------------------------------------------
- N$ C- }6 v2 x! S0 N% a >>
" P8 {% V5 @% `* w" P n* f. B( Y
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
) U, P9 {. Z/ S( j( y$ A& Ein the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint8 m7 K' ^2 b1 c
John and Victoria.) x* c5 t- R8 r; D
- ^( V; a( i& q# W5 ~- r8 v+ t( t
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most# A) P( f9 S0 F) ~! Q. v n
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of& O: p" G5 \# d3 x
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
6 `& n( P' @( Z2 S; T" m; Vreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
' W( t* t3 T" l3 A4 q% `0 ?trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
; X; w$ u1 M1 k& ]across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is4 j' j! E% Z, B' [5 h$ O
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
0 b( M8 R* L5 U% o, l# ufigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable* z& l5 ^9 |( [7 u4 ^( e. \
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on V/ v9 u% p. v! h3 l+ o
November 15, 2006.
1 F, r' \2 {* D. y! f, F& A% l Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of$ D& I! K3 O. Z8 q1 w0 U( b2 Q d
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
3 H) p" r* l. D$ mprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is2 ?: w2 ~: r- r4 F B$ S ^: ^, g
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|