Which lot is better?

fourseasons

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?

# G$ L" e7 ]  c5 h! qLot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
2 z# i* A9 h( d6 ], l9 l1 aLot 44 in Block 5  $198500
% L+ E% W* l& v. M( _( J
Link is here:
http://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/Mact_4B.pdf
4 g7 \0 i4 k6 F* H* B6 uhttp://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/StagePlan.pdf

执迷不悔

Lot 38 in Block 5 is better

Rapala

44, bigger lot, Conner lot, close to the pond, and not facing school yard.

fourseasons

2# 执迷不悔
, [/ ]3 I! k/ q, ?) i+ M+ k$ W

But this one is gone. Have to choose between those two.

fourseasons

3# Rapala
7 c9 {/ E4 m* Z8 ?, x- }
0 f3 {5 {- |: d+ e3 lThanks for your feedback.

If the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.
2 m2 N* Y; h& v4 f5 W
* s* A: m3 W* g8 V- g: H44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet) and you will facing other people's back yard.

Thanks anyway.

Rapala

3# Rapala
5 K) d6 Z+ y- b  b3 R8 T
' s* a9 D8 T6 X0 IThanks for your feedback.

5 J/ |/ k/ L5 B0 G$ [9 ~. bIf the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.

! s( j% C9 m; f' q" k: B9 ~4 ...
' _& O5 }: x* }  y7 P2 D! Hfourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

You don't want the baseball hit your windows, do you? School back yard is good for some people, and bad for some people(no privacy) .
( O. D  V3 U# r& R5 j9 y/ u5 Y
4 _# u6 F. k5 p7 c+ {46 has two backyard neighbor too.

辣椒

1 j3 U( J0 J1 m
) f7 u# r; c6 A7 }% p# ]lot 34对于我来说是最好的啦，虽然钥匙圈是宁静

WST

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?
& v4 U- g# Y( [
Lot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
( x0 ?1 K# c8 b% C! pLot 44 in Block 5  $198500
7 S# ~$ E6 I2 e9 ?$ l. |
+ D3 C/ q) w" |Link is h ...
fourseasons 发表于 2010-1-31 22:27

& Y; F4 k( n# m; _$ S; s8 {. A  B以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
4 i6 ^) `  ]" v4 C, ~7 ?8 jlot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
5 T# U- H& b% e/ T" e* R" slot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
8 z' V9 O! S$ q5 d3 J, W高压线，高速公路，学校，公园，小湖， Ravine, 大湖。

小黄

当然是44好。前面通小池塘，后面是小路。小路南侧是池塘和贵房子。车库在北侧，客厅在南侧正好和邻居相隔较远，客厅可以做两侧窗，或者做成八角形的格局。
' p3 S: `# P1 `: k. `- E) i
; w1 F8 C5 G% ~/ d( ~, ~' w46虽说是靠学校绿地，但那块绿地地势高于房子，不爽。

小黄

以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
( Y, ?& G4 _+ Q+ Xlot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
高 ...
WST 发表于 2010-2-1 16:21

3 D% F: y2 _+ f2 o6 I$ P, [最好是高尔夫。Westbrook那些很不错。

小黄

3# Rapala
6 N5 X7 W# V+ Y. p0 a# i
( V  Z4 r, k$ B; F/ ~  b44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet)
. Z0 Y, F2 D3 V, C+ {% K% v4 d2 n& Bfourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

那只是某指定进深的宽度。
- ^' k! c8 |* y- H
7 O  W2 B5 e3 t6 x" h  b房子的射影不是方形的。在最窄的地方只有车库，34肯定够用。等到了要摆客厅的进深，宽度肯定已经不止34了。具体pocket形状要拿开发商的图纸和建筑商一起讨论如何利用最大面宽。

fourseasons

11# 小黄
  R7 ~: r3 W& s7 H0 u( C
+ e% b; ^, `. J) F4 b* [, X- Z
看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
% Y& I& A7 h) N另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
还有site plan 上注明44是RC (Restrictive covenant),有没有什么说道？

WST

11# 小黄


看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
8 `% Y9 F4 t. B还 ...
# \2 j1 c, h9 B0 pfourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 20:34

38 是pocket size. 我又看了 lot 46 (block 3) 的pocket是38。你再看看。