 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly* C1 t8 I& n/ ]/ j7 G" B' x
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
2 ` A0 I3 o1 tunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house5 ]$ s! R1 V" _; f
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by( L8 [2 q; M$ N c' m
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This& Y$ ?2 x ~2 i' \2 c! i$ J
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction3 q4 f: y4 B2 [
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
: H% K* l. T4 c; V$ X12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past2 z) l9 E2 s2 ], j7 }; T, }
three years.
, A8 i, t* Y& J9 y7 Q' H) BBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
# l; L- A$ p' O( p0 o! ?* rtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of. M# J7 ]. B( ^+ x
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
# j" C& s4 D0 f$ T8 w! iboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices( u a" g6 ^: u" m9 C- {( I
to fundamentally justified levels.
* w8 L0 C& U* J" e/ |We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”: ?9 S: c/ X- M1 g2 d% u+ G2 f. P
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and0 s! j5 n# Y2 [; M% Q+ \6 Y7 F
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
" E/ H0 {1 ~+ q% m ^where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although+ I% g$ E/ Q% m8 A; y# Z
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
3 r$ W$ H( }0 N Y+ k- M“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where6 e/ F9 x, R1 ?, o8 h
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
0 g X3 e* c' C3 a1 d" B9 K+ \that is now being rapidly reined in.! Z2 J9 T! R [, p/ x
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs," _0 y% S" k4 d
the construction of too many new homes over the boom9 ^+ Y" J" d1 a0 ]) [; t
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
: [1 U" Z* |0 d# H8 fon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
7 d' W6 @) T$ `% ~; d" vfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
0 ?( [1 e; h7 ^% c, ^remain choppy and new residential construction will be2 z: s! H# a3 |; `* L% c3 }
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
" c% [# }4 H( p6 E4 \3 mis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this6 V9 {% y& Z' n6 ^. x, M
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide+ [7 S/ _, k0 H( E9 V
residential construction will fall further to around) e8 o$ z/ _: M+ I. a) K8 v
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units3 o6 }7 `% t# v
in the fourth quarter.% Z/ U, t# B- p K; E, ]
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
6 ] }' K5 X6 U. b# g9 C$ V6 [we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
+ z- ~! H* C+ j0 ~fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each0 y7 X4 L) o P$ _2 a
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home/ G& ~2 h* S5 K
values since house prices should track incomes over the/ d; [- ~( H2 J8 Y) ^# K0 q- P0 k
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
) X0 J! L4 E7 ^& x7 V, _ A& |regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
" w* U/ T- S6 |! v6 m; d0 Eof residential construction.; s- A4 ~" ^! V8 {- c N
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a& f5 y, _, ?7 }
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction% D1 N) N1 s3 `6 K
would have occurred if housing had been priced
1 E- S3 J1 F# Y7 y5 e$ Ooptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this4 F& F" v2 W# g5 B1 B; r
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
( c5 J& \! ~6 a" s$ ^/ F# S: uunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
5 r4 m0 R+ \8 P# {* P. |many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
* W) h2 E/ ^9 E. ^Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
) v- p$ e& ?& I/ E, F- xwhere housing demand will further contract under waning" X; T! Z+ @& }7 p
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
0 q* {4 I; r9 y" t7 B, ^5 ]& Malready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the' G" u7 g" y8 O2 H
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
8 g7 z7 `6 f' m" Bbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
# N, s6 c4 ?/ |/ bhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural4 ?1 H5 P8 K' }3 L3 O* Q; c" r
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
5 `; U8 M+ L1 k4 d2 NQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
" b5 r4 K$ L) I& R/ q. Mstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de" {. D6 T w( v, [9 h" x6 f
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
3 _" r5 p5 v6 J, j: Qgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership% _4 r! h" _7 f8 j
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
U N# R, @7 c& D" P. Scyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
+ D9 s/ |/ Z4 @+ x Hlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto5 [& L! `+ F1 R5 S: O
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
$ ~9 O( S6 k7 ^high levels of apartment-style units presently under: R+ u- j1 U& |# ?
construction mean that record numbers of condos will' o" y: v$ H4 M7 h
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as: [, g& t$ l! f& Z( D0 A t
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
9 e: O0 L7 \! w8 cspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
( F: ~2 q/ Z9 hresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
0 i% d; g% r9 y* l! K% T" M5 [anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from9 M! Q6 m! M/ V) k0 Q
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming) P. {, v* z; L* R2 X
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,, P6 v( C% k5 z% _
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
& H! n! r2 T% T8 }. QOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING2 H: Y; U5 |& B1 i& V
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
0 Q2 [+ b; j1 @+ D3 ?) qGrant Bishop, Economist
% p. F; G0 [- `& w& q) y416-982-8063
+ K3 w; H" J2 m* _Pascal Gauthier, Economist% J8 H1 N" s* w1 L' `" a$ U
416-944-5730 ] v+ i4 I: _3 T
& T( w1 }8 U# h, ~2 q/ s( w
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|