data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6990a/6990a9113380c9d8a06d862ebf18afc25d10ba25" alt="" 鲜花( 1181) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b8e9/5b8e9c384264908bea75ae2cf24febdeca379edc" alt="" 鸡蛋( 48)
|
本帖最后由 小黄 于 2009-12-21 13:39 编辑
d% b' V K" R: m# J$ H你也别整呢些弯弯绕了。你就说吧:CIVIC和卡车撞,谁比谁更吸能?谁比谁更容易死?: B2 s, \' j8 c
降龙十八掌 发表于 2009-12-21 11:33 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7652b/7652b610e2e1e8080dfa83a6d53f60bcfd4f82fd" alt=""
( T' M; t. P( K' IThere is no data available. If you do have some, please share. But please don't make up scenarios and data yourself, that's 意淫. Use a published source, or statistically controlled experiment.' t5 q8 `) M' ~
1 E+ o1 P7 C' I& Q. h
From the existing data, there are 3 types of death:
" R- i& m* y, e4 P9 l1) MV: multi vehicle collision, like when a Civic hits another car/truck
5 V" |0 t- P% j4 i7 ^3 k* H0 N2) SV: single vehicle, like hitting a tree, or roll over% K0 J. q" W4 r5 d$ g3 e6 \2 O' h. ^, C
3) SV Roll: roll over, this a sub set of SV.4 o+ S Q: \9 |: b
2 y; K. ^- ]' f2 ^6 [2 v5 u7 QFor Honda Civic:; z# `: @2 d( M% s
MV 34% M- q& R) `& ?+ p
SV 33
0 {+ ~6 B0 w, S0 E# K$ s6 dSV Roll 13
# Q4 m: R7 R8 P) f- v- ~$ c! I' A1 o8 j
0 w% I* x' ?. M: C7 D/ O% E) m( jFor Ford F150 (including super cab, crew cab):3 G) [; X7 a m9 e3 T* r
MV 28~34, v6 h1 {$ a9 _0 z: {6 I; E* k4 t4 {
SV 79~94
7 ]+ c. G7 V" x1 `. f4 }SV Roll 48~82
, p0 W& ^5 [: \9 b9 u c8 U- m! B( q/ J! s9 j, V
For Chevy Silverado 1500:
( H9 a; j( R& h& G: WMV 40
; R* m) K: A+ c4 f6 [SV 85% v4 ^- t9 i7 t/ J5 J7 \3 p) U+ w
SV Roll 61
' J+ W7 _; `# m/ ?# s& v- ?- q
5 P1 i; R1 j- B. t {As you can see, not only would the trucks roll over more easily, they don't perform better even in a vehicle on vehicle collision. So, yeah, Civic is definitely safer than F150 or Silverado. |
|