![](source/plugin/floweregg/images/flower.gif) 鲜花( 0) ![](source/plugin/floweregg/images/egg.gif) 鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
1 h+ A$ U3 P7 V5 G7 T, }: T( ^ K) c/ f7 d4 j! o
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -6 ?0 U" ^: {+ s
1 Q% N2 P4 \+ ?8 r2 B. X
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
- S& u/ Q) O s. [% lexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third% y- c$ {. Z% C
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
: l+ F* A% w! ^: k6 p2 j3 Ein the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
6 j$ x( b2 @! R% o, `; G8 Sprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and1 q& r$ s* C' ~* p2 d0 b' O
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
; C, E% H; s9 _$ o }8 BQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal8 x( w s: w% \( N. W
LePage Real Estate Services." K0 v/ W/ M0 @" R' t0 O( N
7 r3 |* ^* o# k$ H' h/ m6 C. S
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
4 o5 p; o1 k: ?, Yare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic* }5 w9 Y2 E& P8 q: W
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and; Q7 E' l, ~5 X1 ~0 g
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
5 G# v# v4 P8 T; Z k8 \2 oresidential real estate sector., Z9 o; H7 |: o2 j3 \* O
+ P: ^8 O9 J" l/ f% ^$ C4 J+ c Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
0 t$ e: K! n- V* y7 Roccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)0 V1 K4 W' L0 v# Y( O2 u
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5622 _% _1 r' c) P N
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
- ]0 B- e c8 R$ Y3 u(+13.2%)., ^7 C8 F. s. x3 [, @$ n7 G
% F% z7 q( a9 m- @$ r/ [" S: X
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
8 {6 G- ]% R) X Fduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the" P+ L4 y5 s; e$ d9 m, [
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
9 ?) e: t3 L& R7 [" P4 M3 d& jpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
% j# ]3 l# {0 n' _president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.3 P+ W4 z: D5 ?- t8 |$ p
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
3 o& j% _6 Y* v R# Y, `0 Zwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
0 K% d3 a/ s( q8 dbalanced market."& N* e4 o$ {; Y9 O& D
2 ]; O# y: ]) K4 H# n: P
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,, A! s5 q* X/ v* i
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift6 _' s! B" `3 ~ U* Y% O0 V
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued' o+ i& q& {0 C* F M D7 g
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
. i7 h* D6 \: C( ~/ V$ fenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration," i' B# q7 e8 O* D/ B
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record6 {6 _- q! ~+ T
breaking price appreciations.% a0 @; k4 g, e5 u5 n& K, u$ p
, D5 ]- p; A4 J; B. P" I Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding) |1 C' |3 D" x) `6 {* f
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
+ ^5 e. L( [) ? a Alargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
1 l7 \9 g) h. I- a7 N$ d6 W) d- Z8 r/ x+ s3 ?, L
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
1 B+ M' z' j7 @# d% aeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer! k* ^7 [# m5 x: H+ i, Q: E
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off, |5 H# i; A/ D& J
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.1 O1 ]! L/ k/ C' F! ^6 P: J
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
?% W) F% {* q/ c& y3 ygreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
' ]2 P' m7 G, A) {. h2 n: |; pprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
: r4 C! |) a M$ p; @& R* i( L2 [. m
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
N3 P3 U; ?8 L* Omarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and1 |3 k) y+ R0 @
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
0 e; C( v; L+ ?8 I7 rare markedly different than those found in the United States.4 ^. p7 y$ b- s3 f3 z4 e/ G
' R% N+ S) T% b% U Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
6 v$ F4 Z: G8 DAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
1 N# C) b% t" d0 m) i* mfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
2 `* \$ t; J# `, ^; Z9 }, frelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general* U; T; {% V8 }
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
% B7 S0 G& T, [7 q9 o* adownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
' Q: Y- G- z# D" @, z$ U5 C$ G6 Vaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization2 L5 h. N" d& g1 O5 C6 ^
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."" x. l- E/ W. i- T x3 ^+ U
& l* X) f+ P& `4 S* B% |# c! Q <<
* o3 u J! @) s* r2 C% ]+ b REGIONAL SUMMARIES
+ X1 y3 d D0 R) e* r- u& t >>
?- R' H; |' ]" r: d( o) K: \: a" O+ g
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in$ m" ]8 b% W1 g) j: z5 V- u
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
' p* R: k! X3 N$ ~of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
/ v* |& y! P5 p# M8 @$ R+ ]2 Y+ \looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of- N8 i% }' Q; O7 \+ w/ T) {* V
renovations.
4 y9 M/ a4 D( |9 w2 K& m1 [; e; ?' d( J; Z
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight1 [: L1 X/ v& X
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
8 \% Z2 Q; F. i7 t5 r1 F6 hcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
a: n; Q8 A, U) @# U9 b' J# J6 {September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.* G! U' n H5 f1 x& C, g# M/ g
; v, ?- r% D2 [( e. s
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer( J6 N% y9 D" H% f# S! c
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
( o, u2 }, G Y* yquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new! c* g9 w2 s# P& k
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
4 e; v8 a9 s% ]. cto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes: p4 d# b' ~9 ~3 t, m/ o) R" X
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
$ y5 y( g$ S6 v+ X, t- k- [# d. j, o
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
/ ]6 Q- k* [/ _& S1 M/ U( rconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
0 [/ }( b" e$ n3 C T# ihomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
' V! k! E' D8 i! w( g7 nwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
9 e4 e0 ?$ }) Gdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
3 M z( p. N3 O. K3 k" w7 vbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
/ [1 o6 M/ L5 U$ L3 w2 N* x4 m+ z' q, @. E% a9 R- n
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
1 R2 D! _" |! {/ L Kamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes: o/ g( ^% F% Z" I& K( s% ?9 Z$ _
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005, ~6 Y* C; I5 \2 }/ {. @$ }1 R
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
# I1 m# k, M# m/ t3 d1 ?+ `" n7 t% tfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
6 D" t; w: c7 h- B+ G) R0 X9 w" c" V+ h+ k$ ^1 F
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
- m0 _7 W- s# c3 [' J! yprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
/ [9 h7 Z% Q6 d" x2 dlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting, m* B, B! i& j& T& U
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,% ?' R1 E, O; N
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
. t$ @% X( H. N4 ^pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
$ K7 P. @" A/ }6 V5 G' G; y, tmaking a purchase.
: M# \) z3 Z3 W* ^
; Z0 r9 m( X! O$ y. V) N4 B N2 K Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
( x) {% `" ^' B8 v* }( D8 f U: Tmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong, d7 n: x6 Z$ o' b# M K$ }
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city0 Q6 X& l L8 d5 |: i
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
- v! J: j# l5 f. X" j" Cattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
9 U# p; V4 Z5 g2 Xamenities.% `" H7 ]. \1 z% i$ v4 u# l
, R8 k7 r" t# a [% m+ U The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels( V0 g' M8 V) o* Y
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand& N; G7 X5 i: B4 l' E& c1 P% X s
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has" d1 f* e& M; [3 o$ I
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
2 _6 ?& i# d8 wdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle& w5 h, e1 H7 l: m% h2 Z0 v
residence, rather than for investment.
3 V" ~+ ?7 O! j* c% {2 ]
# E- o) w2 x! X3 U The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
! I) {+ [2 I/ f/ F1 W/ j8 I1 A& d4 }$ Khouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted9 x* u( l% Q0 y3 g5 W6 B
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
$ G' b8 v- h Sconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization* [2 X( C2 u/ ^* [4 k
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter& D5 u o! i5 n4 p& m D, T
the market.
# i: f/ b* {1 R
+ Y$ k5 A$ a$ x, Z In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
$ [# g! c+ M6 F4 T$ c VJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
2 E/ V% A4 ^; ~August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring; K/ K) F) R5 ?) M0 y' g
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due; R; K8 f, p0 l, O W0 X
to the shortage of available inventory./ I2 G. e! k A5 q) w- S+ L
& y0 l, m: Q) Y! Q5 @
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its" Y- W3 K1 D1 T# b, w- \* W& u3 R; w
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
- Q i1 u4 [3 O6 s+ k2 w, nvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses, o0 W: V( y4 \7 y
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province./ R7 F. i6 g. s
4 w0 ]9 g+ N" D Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
5 Y% i7 o+ s0 R) a% qin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low/ f" y( Q2 M+ H; Z* g7 B ~
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
3 H, r; B6 w' ]+ |( rpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
4 n {, v* S# |8 K* bprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer$ v+ V* K- X5 c+ G& ^
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as+ ?9 x/ z7 X3 S& Q; Q% Y3 U3 M
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.' G5 F$ M2 w1 N4 I: s
- z0 T) s0 V6 m& Y$ |3 u" V Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
4 C8 n0 f" U4 D8 j% Oas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
" o ]3 Y6 K- d1 B( S$ A8 ^! L" |0 Dremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
; |6 o. v; x. U5 p8 m2 |maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices: @( E: B- e2 }- y
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
2 n8 j4 b& C* M' P f9 xin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
; E6 l8 q: A @towards the end of 2006. 2 o& }$ h" `7 X7 u5 b/ J. @% D% L
: U% u: B; Z1 e) c4 s
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of% U% u! z7 k& @7 M& }
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
* J" p; e; C* Wto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse& H, H- s- j. R% r; @
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
% A8 w6 m, v) I, G* [' X. V6 s5 `foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
2 d# P. a% V/ Tpressure on tight inventory levels.
& a$ F, m z1 s. a I( v5 v& {0 s* x
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic) }4 Z/ ]& x7 H% z# F3 x
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
- P# b+ B' k! p2 P/ G* Q' ]into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
; t- t/ ~* b, Q4 \' y1 Dwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching% Q# ?$ U6 D/ c$ F3 S8 o
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.9 @' p' @; p% c- }8 K3 j! ]+ d6 m
[' I+ V' {" } R" K2 U! I) Q. `2 N
<<. V. B `: x8 B' ^8 K
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006! B6 l) C" d6 o, Q
: E1 M# ]% u$ A) B9 J: x" H* G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( j/ X6 J4 k3 O
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
7 R6 t e) v$ \# D8 J -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 ^5 Z9 ]- b6 T, z& p 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q31 u0 e# I+ U& h( I& v; D7 K4 f
Market Average Average % Change Average Average3 X' a$ w, z& a5 K: ?0 q$ g V1 l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* [" d: P3 F* b/ S
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
9 h: G2 s. z2 L# V7 S" G% R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 m+ h, g% N# c Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0000 A& T; z6 W8 }5 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 C( M: [+ r# J Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0006 M x; n, y# R, |0 x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; O1 z' o+ U+ K8 J9 d# N/ e0 F Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -/ s* A$ m7 v2 P& X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 j6 C; M0 U/ @! n- B St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
- A) E7 c/ _' r' E5 y2 A4 _- M -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 C8 Z3 P5 Z3 `0 b! `
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
' U+ H7 ]3 I3 V4 G& m -------------------------------------------------------------------------
m! D3 S& s- [: d" ~% c Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
! C# P! F6 d& Z- B; D' n4 s -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 f2 c" H; x7 H6 ~# O5 [
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250, m3 j" G5 ^" w+ N/ R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
_3 A* A/ M: M, q7 h" U/ ]5 { Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
3 _8 ?2 o2 m- U- ^6 F: @, ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Z, s+ v/ ]. x- @# ^ Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707) Z& ]5 i; H& @2 f7 S# H& B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 v3 [# O$ o" p( V3 {( J
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5000 S% v# l8 ?: t% n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 [7 V; X4 _5 s; Q9 t Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
0 P' z: d" @3 X! R( O9 m9 {) i3 G/ T -------------------------------------------------------------------------# l0 }6 ^! x t& m& H+ x
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
& v7 P/ _: {$ R) Q' p; l -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ^( E; {9 K5 f+ V# c0 J4 u
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
( K# ?' t7 [; i2 j& y3 d0 Z, g -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% R1 y; O% i" X0 @ Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
1 P: {8 \+ k& V -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 g! U# c" b7 d; F8 i
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
, v) q t- g8 f8 N6 ?8 V0 e8 p! ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 H) v4 b' f; W& [9 d# Y0 D p
2 L1 \# r, I& X# C, U7 v -------------------------------------------------------------
4 z! @6 @, \3 I- z+ Z3 E Standard Condominium
( j9 E( r# w" K8 M( \ -------------------------------------------------------------
& I9 o6 h1 M! G: E/ R 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo, ~" D1 a3 V6 I- l3 C
Market % Change Average Average % Change
4 t: L" r; l/ p( {1 B -------------------------------------------------------------
1 q$ _, E7 S- ?3 N& [/ U Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
. ~2 S+ L2 \) [/ A7 P* `7 f -------------------------------------------------------------
9 I9 }1 b5 C0 |' i Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
1 K% O* d; ]- b -------------------------------------------------------------
+ e! ~/ g: y! o4 H$ x Moncton 4.9% - - N/A- G3 g3 ?8 Y" I$ ~% ^
-------------------------------------------------------------! y" Q4 f H0 F0 l- z% p, n
Saint John N/A - - N/A9 U$ g* }" M! B: X! t2 W( D! I
-------------------------------------------------------------
* M9 ?# B9 s0 a' T7 F St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%; u0 a) C V. g# G L6 `4 W" d
------------------------------------------------------------- F1 s& B. A: l6 l2 l
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
: s M- @0 H# T, P( c# P& b -------------------------------------------------------------2 ~! O( k( j4 b- N. J1 p r ^
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
; M0 O [3 P: I) V! L" T -------------------------------------------------------------
/ C, D% |5 G5 G( G* }; U, G8 x9 v Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
k* L% e3 z( n$ b -------------------------------------------------------------3 a1 a8 w2 J* v5 ~
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
/ S" t, @( f4 y -------------------------------------------------------------5 H2 m5 \3 N" `4 R8 N: N
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
! W9 l7 Y ~" X) a -------------------------------------------------------------! {) L6 b2 r$ U, C* D, C1 p- R
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%6 Y" W' L+ |2 j1 @6 T
-------------------------------------------------------------
* o8 M( @: X$ @& L# ^9 j( Q Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
# M/ P B# a9 q5 w- K+ b; ^ -------------------------------------------------------------
( W$ w; ~, f7 v3 t Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
& h R" v3 U$ f+ x4 X7 d: o -------------------------------------------------------------& C9 O$ g2 n; W- r+ d
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3% X/ R# }, _% \8 H3 [/ j% F
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 g& N% ]9 H: W/ ]( c. R" y Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
& K6 G* e" [ T7 I6 \/ }$ @1 D -------------------------------------------------------------8 g6 t% b4 |+ w* e1 m: `# J
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
( H6 h2 a+ D% s! U3 n; w -------------------------------------------------------------! C, F" v- E% y0 a& b! R" _
>>2 {' J; w6 k t6 H; i. ?
4 Y' s2 \9 }/ }$ C4 n
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined- w! ^! T8 n9 L9 D' t/ F
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint% v. D2 I0 L, T6 A( t4 L# A
John and Victoria.% p* K% L6 Y" B7 A8 S
Y/ A( A" V* z# C' ^ The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most& b" _5 t$ K6 Q: b* y- z
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of; K/ \3 J$ f' d3 }2 I* C( a. i
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release6 U" f( V! O$ c8 h1 k
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price8 ? j/ \' m2 d6 v# h( b
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities: }1 D' f5 J# J
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
1 S- t: R! |2 R: i7 b% ?6 P; aavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current& Y2 g" ]" O0 P3 t, [ T8 c3 c ?
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
0 o. @, h9 p# U0 M' A0 }version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on" `* h1 J! W; H6 d- B
November 15, 2006.& V% |5 a: K$ }7 N
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of9 \$ G8 ^6 \( J
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge v3 K) @+ Y- R: D) Z# H
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
/ _- h* U( [2 l% f p9 ?available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|