埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 4220|回复: 17

[新闻评述] 一夫多妻,解禁有望

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-1-13 10:45 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
最高法院的一份最新研究表明,加拿大法律应当承认一夫多妻制。  V8 O- ?6 X# W& b8 k) u3 w/ q
/ _5 K" z8 N" q. k
此项研究耗资15万加币,调查时间长达一年,最终发现禁止一夫多妻毫无益处。
, S1 ]" @9 y% U1 ]$ J: N# F3 |4 q5 w7 c% F
报告指出,加拿大的部分法律应该修正,以明确那些一夫多妻家庭中的妇女们合法的配偶地位,进而享有正当的财产继承权。8 _4 b$ Z4 _) N9 s/ |* n7 G

- b  v8 q8 k% O5 V" ~2 M% k: M另一项来自女王大学的报告也指出,法律既然认可同性婚姻,也应当承认一夫多妻,否则不公平。# p) ]7 _/ R$ d% I* {2 C

+ M  |% H) r1 ~( ^调查负责人贝雷坚信,加拿大承认一夫多妻,对维护妇女权益意义重大。  F4 `: Z2 u  r/ B/ W- g

; B* ~1 W0 X" O  C
5 [' g1 R8 I1 {* W9 N  P; ~! Q3 o# D
BC省的Bountiful地区对一夫多妻制实际上早已网开一面,这里生活着大量一夫多妻家庭。(译者按:摩门教?)' u5 \: H: K1 n8 G7 N7 s0 I
) j, I% N% q& g5 |
是否予以取缔,BC法院至今犹豫不决。因为依法取缔一夫多妻的后果将是大量妇女儿童流落街头,贫穷饥饿疾病歧视种种问题会接踵而来。
0 M$ t* @" ]' ^  h) B. P
1 c0 |7 q) F$ z3 r- S$ {而且,某种意义上讲,这也干涉了宗教信仰自由,违背了宪法精神。法律自相矛盾,这也是开展此项调查的初衷。
, b6 l8 E, F" z0 L0 S6 L/ F& ?) U6 e: I
司法部官员强调,目前只是出台了一个文字报告,法律上还没有一夫多妻敞开大门。
9 ]/ l8 h) _1 m! @. D
* @5 V0 G! W( S! o$ g6 ^! p涌往加拿大的移民大军中,来自非洲和中东地区的人口比例正在不断上升。这些国家一夫多妻都是合法的。
  w; w7 g: @. }2 c. M/ v+ [4 z9 h) l+ m0 L7 s, y0 [& ^
加拿大各省对一夫多妻态度不一,安省寄予了有限认可,而保守的阿省一直在强烈反对,并极力督促BC立即取缔一夫多妻,however difficult it may be。# B, V5 j! S" M  i
+ ?% Q  k8 x! S. N5 J0 ?1 T
Canada should legalize polygamy: study& L! N  F6 z$ W

- B9 Y+ a& D; eUpdated Fri. Jan. 13 2006 6:45 AM ET, P& o: ?: x9 ]$ y

7 G6 R1 K- Q. j3 B8 ^/ A7 b& rCanadian Press9 K% H4 [' m5 X- v- M

4 p4 T4 b+ E# p& QOTTAWA — A new study for the federal Justice Department says Canada should get rid of its law banning polygamy, and change other legislation to help women and children living in such multiple-spouse relationships.
% {, F7 W  _/ Z( ~. i  {5 N+ _$ a4 r- T
. U0 D/ J- H3 v: H"Criminalization does not address the harms associated with valid foreign polygamous marriages and plural unions, in particular the harms to women," says the report, obtained by The Canadian Press under the Access to Information Act. "The report therefore recommends that this provision be repealed."   i' B: [7 ~, ^+ g5 x
3 t) u8 c& q+ A2 j$ R
The research paper is part of a controversial $150,000 polygamy project, launched a year ago and paid for by the Justice Department and Status of Women Canada.
# R* ?8 _3 N9 l- i3 i4 p0 [1 f2 |7 Z3 o
The paper by three law professors at Queen's University in Kingston, Ont., argues that Sec. 293 of the Criminal Code banning polygamy serves no useful purpose and in any case is rarely prosecuted. ' K- B( q6 l% d2 p8 H+ c7 f  c

4 r" _7 f. v2 I# h; UInstead, Canadian laws should be changed to better accommodate the problems of women in polygamous marriages, providing them clearer spousal support and inheritance rights. : ~! _. Y& B& q0 C/ J$ P& h& i
, g1 R' `. A1 U( \: O, t
Currently, there's a hodgepodge of legislation across the provinces, some of whom - Ontario, for example - give limited recognition to foreign polygamous marriages for the purposes of spousal support. Some jurisdictions provide no relief at all. $ U& G6 @* X- y$ K/ I& Q

- k8 j  G% D4 z' y! G" t8 ZChief author Martha Bailey says criminalizing polygamy, typically a marriage involving one man and several wives, serves no good purpose and prosecutions could do damage to the women and children in such relationships. # M3 o! R" s1 J+ D* |
- D  o  K: z" y: Y; L
"Why criminalize the behaviour?" she said in an interview. "We don't criminalize adultery.
+ Y3 x; |" a4 _: f/ t2 I+ c  d- {2 w" |  l) N8 u+ t
"In light of the fact that we have a fairly permissive society. Why are we singling out that particular form of behaviour for criminalization?" ' w9 P6 i% z" I& e" _

6 o2 _# B* I: p& e7 mInstead, there are other laws available to deal with problems often associated with polygamous unions, which are not legally recognized as marriages in Canada. , G7 `8 _/ L! \2 k
, d, ^* {# _/ \3 F( q. h. U
"If there are problems such as child abuse, or spousal abuse, there are other criminal provisions or other laws dealing with those problems that certainly should be enforced," Bailey said.
( a; t) m. j1 o8 I0 ?& n6 p3 S( ]1 n8 R5 ?
The Justice Department project was prompted in part by an RCMP investigation into the religious community of Bountiful in Creston, B.C., where polygamy is practised openly.
! z: K& C8 C8 y  V
9 k. s' t$ {- S- z  D* TThe British Columbia government has long been considering whether to lay charges under Section 293. 0 d1 y; z: N& i2 V; }
7 P% V8 V  N& \. P- V9 A
But the project was also intended to provide the Liberal government with ammunition to help defend its same-sex marriage bill last spring.
, u  r; b3 i" Z8 Z3 A; V5 ^3 J! ~$ c( @+ j8 v
Opponents claimed the bill, now law, was a slippery slope that would open the door to polygamy and even bestiality.
1 Y4 |3 m+ H* n7 ^- h% y% Q' x) B' [. J
Another report for the project, also led by two Queen's University professors, dismisses the slippery-slope argument, saying that allowing same-sex marriages promotes equality while polygamous marriages are generally harmful to women's interests and would therefore promote inequality.
/ [; F# Y% I$ {
0 e& z& T; t0 ^! U; B( I2 ?7 {; aLiberal Justice Minister Irwin Cotler said he has seen only a summary of the research reports, but already rejects lifting the criminal ban on polygamy. 5 l5 ?; p- J# r* U& j- l  y

8 b8 V6 G+ E7 ~+ [/ |/ n3 ?"At this point, the practice of polygamy, bigamy and incest are criminal offences in Canada and will continue to be," he said from Montreal.
1 B: R2 e/ {" N! V3 U, H8 g! g( J! P- M$ Y- n1 y( g! R! @# r6 ^6 S
"These reports will become part of the knowledge base on this issue and will be taken into account."
, D# D+ M+ |% E4 G7 e' q5 V
$ J' l5 x9 U: p; i8 [2 KThe Bailey report, consistent with other research for the project, also concludes the courts might well rule that Canada's law banning polygamy is a violation of Canada's constitutional guarantee of freedom of religion. 7 T8 _1 B, N# v* d2 S
- m* E9 b* k- J' C
But Section 293 would survive such a challenge because the harm to women and children in many polygamous marriages is well documented - abuse, poverty, coercion, health problems - and the limit to religious freedom would be considered "reasonable," as allowed under Section 1 of the charter.
' x7 i5 a/ Z5 k  g, E
5 A: n) X' _  ]4 }4 m; L/ V2 hAlthough the Bountiful case raises immediate issues, Canada is also faced with a rising tide of immigration from Africa and the Middle East, where polygamy is legally and religiously sanctioned. Immigration officers can refuse entry to individuals practising polygamy. & H! K6 @% t5 F* ?/ u- X, [
, j3 j$ ~+ R, }3 y8 D( g6 V9 q4 Z
Bailey said Canada should nevertheless offer some recognition to polygamous marriages that are legally valid in foreign countries to help protect women's rights here.
5 s0 ]: C# q; p( l# _
, g% k+ Z+ r2 i* b3 g" dAnother paper for the project, by the Alberta Civil Liberties Research Centre, urges British Columbia to proceed immediately with a prosecution in Bountiful. - A8 k. E3 e, S, j! d2 f0 A
! f( L3 I* H: O" R) c
"Based on the harms associated with polygamy as it is practised in Bountiful, there do not appear to be any alternatives to prosecution, however difficult it may be."( i' L/ \4 {6 [+ \8 R

) y, I+ f7 E" @- R: p# G  H[ 本帖最后由 片儿刀 于 2006-1-13 19:38 编辑 ]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-1-13 14:44 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 片儿刀 于 2006-1-13 09:45 发表
( m% d3 [0 a9 \/ ]) `- R! [2 a调查负责人贝雷坚信,加拿大承认一夫多妻,对维护妇女权益意义重大。" _: d7 i$ k/ E- \

& H3 a% e% v% F8 H5 U9 H
/ B8 G& x0 L5 b! ]* k对啊!这是妇女的福音啊。怎么就没有想到呢?15万加元花的值啊!
鲜花(1394) 鸡蛋(16)
发表于 2006-1-13 18:49 | 显示全部楼层
标题有点绕口,应该叫:一夫多妻好处多!
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
 楼主| 发表于 2006-1-13 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队 追求完美
原帖由 老杨 于 2006-1-13 17:49 发表
' j3 ~# Y# G2 y+ e, y! W8 H% [标题有点绕口,应该叫:一夫多妻好处多!
( B1 M" F8 F. _3 \  z* W. z" k

( A  g  |+ I- X0 c8 U0 M太火爆了,心脏受不了。
鲜花(6) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-1-13 21:49 | 显示全部楼层
刚才看新闻说俄罗斯也在考虑衣服多起的可能性,倡议者说,这是个增加人口的好办法,
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-1-13 23:40 | 显示全部楼层
衣服多起。海版原来是刘备的知音。呵呵。
鲜花(150) 鸡蛋(3)
发表于 2006-1-14 08:51 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
事实都存在了,承认了更好。。。。就像很多伊斯兰教国家。
鲜花(48) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-1-14 10:12 | 显示全部楼层
大选后如果自由党继续当政,还会有更多的新招呢。大家等着看热闹吧!可能有一天会逼着你在这里无路可走,移民中国呢。
5 Y9 j  ^( m  [& {) l9 k* P% D) z/ _3 t" a
[ 本帖最后由 UpUpUp 于 2006-1-14 09:14 编辑 ]
鲜花(776) 鸡蛋(24)
发表于 2006-1-14 17:31 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
刚看标题时以为是个搞笑贴,没想到是这么严肃和真实的
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-1-14 18:46 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
还有一妻多夫制(母系),多妻多夫制(平衡),都要试试。
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-1-16 22:22 | 显示全部楼层
哈哈哈,盼望那一天
鲜花(16) 鸡蛋(2)
发表于 2006-1-17 23:05 | 显示全部楼层
中国移民女性肯定不同意,一些男人们高兴了.还是回国女人的权益能得到保障.
鲜花(10) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-1-18 01:36 | 显示全部楼层
同言同羽 置业良晨
那一夫多妻及一妻多夫~哪種合理~哪種值得推崇~真是反了~~~唉~~
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-1-18 05:24 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
唉,还是这群老外思想觉悟高啊!不过他们也只是拾我们老祖宗的牙慧而已,无甚大惊小怪的嘛!多妻制已有几千年的历史了,既然这种制度经历了如此长的时间,那么必定有它存在的需要和理由。其实,想必大家都知道,每个人都有权力去选择自己生活的方式,这个简单的道理,既然在其他问题上我们可以做到尊重和理解,但为什么在多妻制的问题上要刻意地去压制和斥驳呢?有道是“己所不欲勿施于人”嘛。不错,现代婚姻有着明显而强烈的排它性,不允许有婚外恋,我认为这是现代人的婚姻道德观给现代婚姻的硬式定性,从而也否定了多妻制。不过,我确实希望在有生之年,能再度见证一下历史,若还能有幸享受齐人之美,那就再好不过了!哈哈!数风流人物,还看今朝!老毛真有先见之明,佩服佩服!
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-1-18 20:08 | 显示全部楼层
武则天再世啊
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-1-19 19:21 | 显示全部楼层
我想很多男人都不会反对! 我也是。呵呵,这个叫做诚实!8 C% \, K1 z- B3 V# H$ Q
从小到大,喜欢过很多女生。 对每个女孩都是很欣赏。如果都可以娶回家就好了!
" J! Q% b2 `$ T! p/ c$ ~- c& W; q0 q& q' r
呵呵,这是一个想法,我想很多女孩子肯定不同意。, p4 w. O) P* S+ v
3 R6 X9 z3 A+ h
女孩子对待爱情比男孩子更认真,她们是感性的。古时候女性没有太大的权利。现在不同了,她们一定会拚了命的反对这个提议!
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-1-19 20:27 | 显示全部楼层
同言同羽 置业良晨
原帖由 杜超 于 2006-1-19 18:21 发表
7 h& |3 `3 I& r# n/ v. ^我想很多男人都不会反对! 我也是。呵呵,这个叫做诚实!; k- e2 h! t9 ^7 A0 k
从小到大,喜欢过很多女生。 对每个女孩都是很欣赏。如果都可以娶回家就好了!8 {+ w) j$ n1 c+ k- h" }" W' _
- R2 t" S3 G+ t9 A3 C" h) q
呵呵,这是一个想法,我想很多女孩子肯定不同意。# }; _/ ^7 z  V4 \+ q1 ^- D
8 K2 r/ ~- _; d6 k
女孩子对待爱情比 ...
$ S0 a! F2 f" ^* O. w  H7 Q

4 B, q4 E, v" k: [! V1 M& l3 t# w& d* N  d- g6 x
男子照样反对。
鲜花(49) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-1-20 01:15 | 显示全部楼层
时代不同了,请不要臆想谁会支持、谁会反对?等结果吧!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2024-11-24 05:10 , Processed in 0.143337 second(s), 41 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表