埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2406|回复: 23

一年内不能涨两次房租的规定哪里可以找到?

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-2 19:43 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
看到有网友写到:5 Z; F/ T; e4 P+ o! v) V  O$ q
" v2 i0 Q1 q1 j3 p
Part of (Premier Ed Stelmach's) announcement on Tuesday was that any tenant that had had a rent increase ((before April 24 )) in the previous 365 days could not have their rent raised again (for another year)
4 q8 j) U# t3 c! m8 S! p/ g8 X那就是指在4月24日往前的365天内,已经涨租金的不能在最后那次涨租金的那天开始往后的一年内再次涨价.
, ?: ~# z* i6 h& O% e
+ z3 z4 c  s" O  k- F9 G具体规定哪里可以找到?请知情者帮助.
' }& s2 R4 a8 n/ v1 v
6 U) g2 V3 B. A6 p1 `$ G谢谢.
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-2 20:29 | 显示全部楼层
好像政府还在讨论中???
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-3 08:40 | 显示全部楼层
魁北克,据说涨5块钱要征得租户同意。
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-3 08:44 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队 追求完美
昨天听邻居说已经通过了。
理袁律师事务所
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-3 08:57 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 luoyangfengbo 于 2007-5-3 09:44 发表
1 j; U- D1 s5 _2 b昨天听邻居说已经通过了。
6 n, P4 U7 r+ F+ ?
已经通过了。
鲜花(10) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-3 09:19 | 显示全部楼层
I phone Alberta Services this morning, they said the law didn't pass yet. We have to wait maybe couple of weeks.
鲜花(10) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-3 09:20 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
只听"哐当"一声响,天上掉下来个锅盖,正砸在 wuge 头上,上面还有 蓝色狂想 做的 蜗牛卡 卡一张
, p- y/ i/ f$ [6 t4 c卡片说明: 只要坚持发帖子,蜗牛也能变富翁!
; i0 G9 F. s3 w% H卡片效果: 5 金币 现金 ! R- P% F4 r# a8 x3 p
) k4 f( E* p) \) Q( W$ G' e0 J+ [
I have to get more gold to pay my rent.
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-3 10:35 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 luoyangfengbo 于 2007-5-3 09:44 发表
1 h" ]5 w1 b& ^3 f. a7 H3 B2 n昨天听邻居说已经通过了。

! B. m1 s/ c0 p, s! [  }Really?
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-3 11:37 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(22) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-3 11:47 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
原帖由 nataya 于 2007-5-3 12:37 发表 5 R- R- r0 c1 d) w
[ZT] http://www.servicealberta.gov.ab.ca/dsp_landlords_changes.cfm

6 T( a3 ~% Y* c' hthanks
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-3 12:53 | 显示全部楼层
昨天邻居还上citytv了,是电视台告诉她们的,因为我们和现在的房主有些分歧,所以告诉了媒体。citytv昨天打电话说,新法通过了,而且还来采访了她们。这样我们可以坚持住一年。(我们的房主要买房,通知我们可能90天要搬走)
* h4 V, N* s/ L1 a# {1 W5 t5 f. ?: A
8 P5 J& I/ {5 N) U- D[ 本帖最后由 luoyangfengbo 于 2007-5-3 13:57 编辑 ]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-3 12:57 | 显示全部楼层
http://www.servicealberta.gov.ab ... n=section:landlords
/ d, u# H) Y8 F, O  K
/ o: v. l8 g/ y( q0 E  m5 S0 Y  Z) k应该是通过了,没有错!庆祝一下!
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-3 16:57 | 显示全部楼层
同言同羽 置业良晨
确实通过了,可惜没有设置涨幅限制.  _0 {; D; v% E* p; W
不过至少目前还是好消息.
鲜花(10) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-3 17:07 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
原帖由 霜冷 于 2007-5-3 17:57 发表 : W8 t" G- t8 x4 p
确实通过了,可惜没有设置涨幅限制.
* ?5 w3 [) |, G% O' ~& F& X) N不过至少目前还是好消息.
1 \' k' x) _) f7 ^% m
! ^" ~4 b( d- \9 ^- c# q1 y0 D7 }
那真是奇怪,我今天上午打电话 alberta services, 他们还说没有通过。. J& {/ H! W9 q* W
真不知道是怎么回事
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-3 17:48 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
 楼主| 发表于 2007-5-3 21:38 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢大家.
5 z! S' W  v/ L- ]看了9楼的链接
2 ^' s9 A9 e: W- y% E' lhttp://www.servicealberta.gov.ab.ca/dsp_landlords_changes.cfm/ A. X: y: r" S
第一段---If passed, the changes will be retroactive to April 24, 2007.- W" U% ]+ Y, V! Q3 `. F
是否还在讨论?
6 A/ l0 h5 |* p/ M( P/ X0 S) Q: }! O9 C: c6 |
[ 本帖最后由 日子 于 2007-5-3 22:50 编辑 ]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-7 16:03 | 显示全部楼层
同言同羽 置业良晨
I did not see any news about it is passed. Here is what I found:
- t  l3 P, y5 d% [% Q. s, X  w+ e' e9 G8 j

1 g" R- ]5 ]7 U2 t0 PAlberta government delays housing bill (4:05 p.m.)
+ j, Y* N9 L  bLegislation expected to limit rent increase to once a year
4 ]: Y( o7 y: |" rArchie McLean, edmontonjournal.com: o6 H4 Z9 L4 g4 J
Published: Tuesday, May 01, 2007
# M  \7 s' M1 B6 q" l: a" _+ ~$ D& `8 W) @* O$ U( ]
http://www.canada.com/edmontonjo ... f0ccbc2&k=65881
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-7 20:57 | 显示全部楼层
I could be wrong. But today I heard a totally different story from your guys'. The radio said that the government did nnot pass the motion. I think we need to double check. Maybe someone could find a clue.
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-7 21:09 | 显示全部楼层
刚找到今天的新闻. 篇幅长了点. 但中心思想是: 政府没通过动议. 房主还可以随意涨价. 大家对政府的批评很多. 但无可奈何.
/ A& z6 x( c$ R, X2 F4 RReconsider rent controls, premier told7 S4 G% L0 f3 y6 U! P$ F
Councillor says Tories' failure to take action on extreme increases 'misguided, irresponsible'  v8 c  e, p2 h4 X
Duncan Thorne and Andrea Sands, The Edmonton Journal6 x5 c- O  J: O/ Y
Published: Monday, May 07, 2007
! W0 _  }' A  h! L- @EDMONTON - Premier Ed Stelmach should consider rent controls despite a vote against them by Tory convention delegates, city councillors say.7 V+ t3 {/ J) q. r. H+ O( E, K

( G* F5 r. k( xCoun. Michael Phair said Sunday rent controls are essential, while Coun. Terry Cavanagh, who once had the job of phasing out provincial rent controls, urged Stelmach to look seriously at bringing them back.
) y4 p. }/ C' \& h- F3 B
4 Z. ~3 u: T* z% M% VStelmach appeared open to the idea Friday when he said $1,000-a-month increases that had been reported are "un-Albertan."
, B8 J4 s( X5 c0 d( W
- c( r. j: I/ Z
0 z9 q8 B/ X7 `+ oEmail to a friend  t& Y* _0 F) I7 Q) N, I! E
* D2 M4 t3 i' F
Printer friendly
/ `& U! `3 h- T/ i: }6 C- E2 hFont: ****Municipal Affairs Minister Ray Danyluk attacked "unscrupulous" landlords.* s# |- `6 }! S& V

* M6 t6 W! e. H# C6 K3 q, lThen, Conservative delegates voted Saturday against controls. Stelmach said they made their opposition clear, while Danyluk said the issue is now "dead."
# z1 R. `+ D5 G
# O- x* _- ]% L# w: ~) t"It's very misguided," Phair said. "There are many people who rent across the province who will be quite disappointed that the party didn't take a different course of action."8 Z9 V$ G) R* o; W$ ]/ `2 ]7 }
+ W0 u/ j" `( p% C, g; z
He hopes Stelmach "will actively pursue initiatives that effectively confine rent increases to amounts that are affordable to renters."
0 R. G, }% r. P% O
: C. V" A' @6 m  |- EPressure will keep building for the province to act, Phair said. "It will be irresponsible for the government to not take some kind of action."! J, t9 H/ _. C; p- j; {0 b/ @

. G# n$ b# M. tBig increases could force some people virtually on to the streets, he said. "The ideology that you can't interfere is not appropriate.". p1 b: ]5 U7 E% h
3 d1 N: |1 N! b7 `" a
A provincial task force recommended rent controls because of large increases across the province in the last 12 to 18 months, Phair said. He said the problem is more widespread than people realize.+ z) Z+ |8 `. U! I  O/ g
# O8 J. z( D9 G  b4 b1 M- ~
Alberta introduced rent controls in 1975, when inflation soared. Coun. Terry Cavanagh was chairman of the provincial rent "decontrol" board that oversaw the phase-out of the controls between 1977 and 1980.$ k4 C6 L1 L8 d! R; r5 L, Z
: l6 V% X; [% t2 `( k
Cavanagh said Stelmach should consider them again. "It's something the province has to look at, when you have people whose rents are going from $550 to $1,100.! t' _8 h4 S( ~
; V3 f; F9 l( q8 m) z/ B; t/ F4 p* V
"Their wages aren't going up 100 per cent," he said. "It's going to be difficult for them to pay."
2 C1 C- Q9 q6 T5 v
) B; g# a% Q! Q8 _2 F4 b8 o% QControls were phased out in an orderly fashion when he ran the decontrol board, Cavanagh said.
# o/ x/ g$ L4 H. ?2 ~- G( ^+ f$ d$ H! [0 }* }6 M3 v; r. ?% G
Landlords were allowed limited annual increases so that, once an apartment's rent exceeded a certain amount, controls came off.# k1 K9 A- i2 g

4 y# g2 {2 I0 c7 SThat way the pricier units, presumably occupied by higher-income tenants, came out of control first, he said.. ~! K% w- w  w5 z

% R# V9 C& z2 ^5 bCavanagh said landlords are entitled to increases, to a point. "Thirty per cent would be pretty good for someone who bought a building 30 years ago and has paid off the mortgage."
0 x3 M8 l* R7 g( o  ~
, S8 d+ _! l% O, [5 w3 }) ~0 RCity staff are working on a report expected in June that looks at the city's options for tackling the rent squeeze without provincial help.% L9 i- \+ p7 W+ o% Z

" @% ]8 F* Z  W7 k, o/ X' BThe director of the University of Toronto's Centre for Urban and Community Studies dismissed Alberta government promises to shield tenants from unfair rent increases without legislating rent controls.3 H$ r! A% Y' N' h$ q# j
, n' Y: @  p3 m8 N+ J9 Q
"There's only one way to do it -- by regulating rents in a situation of extreme demand for housing," David Hulchanski said.
9 {% d7 k- ]! \$ H" U' K) J# {; [3 c) b- C6 u; T
A provincial fund of $7 million intended for people facing evictions because of rent hikes is a "political fig leaf" that subsidizes landlords at taxpayers' expense, Hulchanski said.6 B' T$ z1 m( A6 S
6 M9 X1 F8 y# o7 M9 ?
"It's a very unconservative thing to do -- to take taxpayer dollars and do that," he said. "It's merely subsidizing the problem."
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
 楼主| 发表于 2007-5-8 20:24 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
SO BAD.
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-9 09:37 | 显示全部楼层
发邮件问了一下alberta service ,回答是确实没有通过,还在审议阶段。遗憾!
鲜花(6) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-9 09:38 | 显示全部楼层
同言同羽 置业良晨
到底通过了没?
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-5-10 09:34 | 显示全部楼层

not yet

同言同羽 置业良晨
still reading...
郁郁 该用户已被删除
发表于 2007-5-12 22:01 | 显示全部楼层
www.canadaren.com.cn 去这里找加国相关政策
* k- L( h3 v* b& x) P) z3 rwww.hiltonworldwide.cn租房信息查询
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2024-11-30 23:52 , Processed in 0.162375 second(s), 37 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表